Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] vsprintf: Add __printf attribute to where it's required

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 3:51 PM Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue 2025-03-25 11:15:21, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2025-03-21 16:40:46, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > This whole series started from a simple fix (see the last patch)
> > > to make GCC (Debian 14.2.0-17) happy when compiling with `make W=1`
> > > (note, that CONFIG_WERROR=y and all warnings break the build!)
> > > down to a rabbit hole.
> > >
> > > However starting from v2 the last patch doesn't require the first
> > > part, I prefer still to have them since the functions, while being
> > > _binary_ printf()-like, are still printf()-like. It also puts in align
> > > the tracing stuff with the rest and fixes the wrong parameter value.
> > >
> > > These first 4 patches are organised in a strict order and can't be
> > > reshuffled, otherwise it will produce a warnings in between.
> > >
> > > I believe the best route for the series is printk tree with immutable
> > > tag or branch for the others.
> > >
> > > Alternatively the first 4 patches can be applied first as they
> > > are pretty much straightforward. They also can be squashed to one
> > > (as the same topic behind), but it all is up to the respective
> > > maintainers.
> >
> > The whole series looks good to me:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I am going to push it via the printk tree. I think about doing
> > so as a second pull request by the end of this merge window.
> >
> > Anyway, I am going to wait few more days for eventual feedback
> > or push back.
>
> JFYI, I have pushed the patchset into printk/linux.git,
> branch for-6.15-printf-attribute.
>
> I am going to send a pull request the following week
> if nothing happens in the meantime.

Thank you!
It will make us much closer to the moment when we can enable WERROR=y
in the CIs for `make W=1` on x86 defconfigs (those that are in the
kernel source tree).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko