Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: mincore: fix tmpfs mincore test failure

From: Baolin Wang
Date: Sun Mar 30 2025 - 15:48:14 EST




On 2025/3/27 22:36, Zi Yan wrote:
On 25 Mar 2025, at 23:38, Baolin Wang wrote:

When running mincore test cases, I encountered the following failures:

"
mincore_selftest.c:359:check_tmpfs_mmap:Expected ra_pages (511) == 0 (0)
mincore_selftest.c:360:check_tmpfs_mmap:Read-ahead pages found in memory
check_tmpfs_mmap: Test terminated by assertion
FAIL global.check_tmpfs_mmap
not ok 5 global.check_tmpfs_mmap
FAILED: 4 / 5 tests passed
"

The reason for the test case failure is that my system automatically enabled
tmpfs large folio allocation by adding the 'transparent_hugepage_tmpfs=always'
cmdline. However, the test case still expects the tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm to
allocate small folios, which leads to assertion failures when verifying readahead
pages.

To fix this issue, remount tmpfs to a new test directory and set the 'huge=never'
parameter to avoid allocating large folios, which can pass the test.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


<snip>


errno = 0;
- fd = open("/dev/shm", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0600);
+ /* Do not use large folios for tmpfs mincore testing */
+ retval = mount("tmpfs", tmpfs_loc, "tmpfs", 0, "huge=never,size=4M");
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, retval) {
+ TH_LOG("Unable to mount tmpfs for testing\n");
+ }
+
+ retval = snprintf(testfile, INPUT_MAX, "%s/test_file", tmpfs_loc);
+ ASSERT_GE(INPUT_MAX, retval) {
+ TH_LOG("Unable to create a tmpfs for testing\n");
+ }
+
+ fd = open(testfile, O_CREAT|O_RDWR, 0664);

The fd permission is changed from 0600 to 0664, but it probably does not
matter.

It is just a temp file, so it doesn't matter.


ASSERT_NE(-1, fd) {
TH_LOG("Can't create temporary file: %s",
strerror(errno));
@@ -363,6 +382,8 @@ TEST(check_tmpfs_mmap)
munmap(addr, FILE_SIZE);
close(fd);
free(vec);
+ umount(tmpfs_loc);
+ rmdir(tmpfs_loc);
}

TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.43.5

Otherwise, LGTM. Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for reviewing.