On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 11:33:59AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 31.03.25 20:27, Gregory Price wrote:
We discussed [1] how this auto-sizing can cause 1GB huge page
allocation failures (assuming you online as ZONE_NORMAL). That means
ACPI-informed sizing by default would potentially be harmful to existing
systems and adding yet-another-boot-option just seems nasty.
I've since dropped acpi-informed block size patch[2]. If there are opinions
otherwise, I can continue pushing it.
Oh, I thought we would be going forward with that. What's the reason we
would not want to do that?
It seemed like having it reduce block size by default would make 1GB huge
pages less reliable to allocate. If you think this isn't a large concern,
I can update and push again.