On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 09:34:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'm not sure if this is going to the final version but could you please add this
patch to stable with Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>?
We might need to bring the whole series to avoid conflicts to stable tree.
This is all rather confused.
Do we need to backport all three patches into -stable? If so, all three
should have Fixes:. Preferably they all have the same Fixes: so we
aren't backporting untested patch combinations.
I'd just as soon leave the entire thing out of stable backports.
Only the first patch actually fixes a bug (very small memory leak
during system tear down, so it's not even a critical bug). This could
be added to stable.
Patches 2 and 3 aren't fixes, they're desired behavioral changes
to the feature. An interface being confusing doesn't mean it's broken.
~Gregory