Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Introduce CET supervisor state support

[Dave Hansen]

On 4/2/25 14:12, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> In any case, at this point I think we need to either double down on polishing
> this thing up (by pausing other work) and have a clear “please do this with
> these patches" request, or declare failure and argue for the smaller version.
> 
> I guess I still lean towards keeping the optimization. But I do think it's worth
> considering at this point.

I'm not quite feeling the same sense of panic and some need to pause
other work. This is thing is at v4. Between spring break and the merge
window, v4 hasn't gotten many eyeballs, except Chang's (thanks Chang!).