Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drm/ci: check-patch: unshallow repository before fetching
From: Vignesh Raman
Date: Thu Apr 03 2025 - 02:04:17 EST
Hi Daniel,
On 28/03/25 17:40, Vignesh Raman wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On 28/03/25 17:05, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi Vignesh,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 11:03, Vignesh Raman
<vignesh.raman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ensure the repository is not shallow before fetching branches in
check-patch job. This prevents issues where git merge-base fails
due to incomplete history. Set the timeout of check-patch job to 1h.
Ouch - an hour is pretty brutal. Is there a way to unshallow only back
to the merge base?
I set it to 1h, but the job is completed in ~15min for
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/merge_requests/18
which has 486 commits.
I will check if we can unshallow only up to the merge base.
I tried this and still checkpatch failed. Below is the sequence.
- GitLab starts with a shallow fetch (depth=10).
- Script fetches full commit history (--unshallow --filter=blob:none).
We need this to calculate the merge-base commit.
- Calculates how much history to fetch using the merge-base commit.
- Refetch with depth (--depth=N) until the merge-base commit
- checkpatch.pl fails because the earlier blobless fetch (--unshallow
--filter=blob:none) skipped file contents.
Please see the commit and pipeline,
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/commit/40a3fc31c2405f90f3fc3177a575a66a10b33324
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/vigneshraman/linux/-/jobs/73884148
Looks like the reliable solution is to fully unshallow the repository
(without any --filter) and set a 30m timeout? Would this be acceptable?
Regards,
Vignesh
Regards,
Vignesh
Cheers,
Daniel