Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: modify struct field to use standard bool type
From: Samuel Abraham
Date: Thu Apr 03 2025 - 03:09:25 EST
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 6:06 AM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote:
>
> > The struct field uses the uint values 0 and 1 to represent false and
> > true values respectively.
> >
> > Convert cases to use the bool type instead to conform to Linux
> > coding styles and ensure consistency.
>
> This is vague. Ensure consistency with what? You can point out that true
> or false was already being used elsewhere in the code.
Okay Noted.
>
> >
> > reported by Coccinelle:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > index ed6942e289a5..82f54f769ed1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ap.c
> > @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ void update_bmc_sta(struct adapter *padapter)
> > psta->qos_option = 0;
> > psta->htpriv.ht_option = false;
> >
> > - psta->ieee8021x_blocked = 0;
> > + psta->ieee8021x_blocked = false;
> >
> > memset((void *)&psta->sta_stats, 0, sizeof(struct stainfo_stats));
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h
> > index b3535fed3de7..63343998266a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/sta_info.h
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct sta_info {
> > uint qos_option;
> > u8 hwaddr[ETH_ALEN];
> >
> > - uint ieee8021x_blocked; /* 0: allowed, 1:blocked */
> > + bool ieee8021x_blocked;
>
> This declaration doesn't have the same alignment as the others.
>
> You should also check whether this is a structure that is read from the
> hardware. In that case, it would be a concern if the bool field does not
> have the same size as the uint one.
>
> julia
Thank you very much. I will confirm and effect the changes
Adekunle