Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] i2c: core: Follow i2c-parent when retrieving an adapter from node

[Wolfram Sang]

> The debug message can be interesting when things went wrong and we want
> to investigate potential issue with i2c-parent chain from the last device
> up to the adapter.

I thought so but couldn't estimate how often this is useful in reality.
I agree that introducing 'dev' is too much hazzle, yet I think the
message should have some id to disitnguish potential different adapter
chains. Either that, or...

> I don't have a strong opinion about the need of this message and I can
> simply remove it.

... we just remove it and let people add their debug stuff while
developing.

> What is your preference ?

A tad more 'removing'.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature