Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Add some validation for vector, vector crypto and fp stuff

[patchwork-bot+linux-riscv]

Hello:

This series was applied to riscv/linux.git (for-next)
by Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 13:11:43 +0000 you wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Yo,
> 
> This series is partly leveraging Clement's work adding a validate
> callback in the extension detection code so that things like checking
> for whether a vector crypto extension is usable can be done like:
> 	has_extension(<vector crypto>)
> rather than
> 	has_vector() && has_extension(<vector crypto>)
> which Eric pointed out was a poor design some months ago.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v4,1/6] RISC-V: add vector extension validation checks
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/9324571e9eea
  - [v4,2/6] RISC-V: add vector crypto extension validation checks
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/38077ec8fc11
  - [v4,3/6] RISC-V: add f & d extension validation checks
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/12e7fbb6a84e
  - [v4,4/6] dt-bindings: riscv: d requires f
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/534d813a0620
  - [v4,5/6] dt-bindings: riscv: add vector sub-extension dependencies
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/e9f1d61a5e18
  - [v4,6/6] dt-bindings: riscv: document vector crypto requirements
    https://git.kernel.org/riscv/c/a0d857205756

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html