Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: pwm: Convert lpc32xx-pwm.txt to YAML

[Purva Yeshi]

On 02/04/25 12:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/04/2025 19:32, Purva Yeshi wrote:
> > On 13/03/25 16:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 12/03/2025 13:27, Purva Yeshi wrote:
> > > > Convert the existing `lpc32xx-pwm.txt` bindings documentation into a
> > > > YAML schema (`nxp,lpc3220-pwm.yaml`).
> > > >
> > > > Set `"#pwm-cells"` to `const: 3` for expected PWM cell properties.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Purva Yeshi <purvayeshi550@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > <form letter>
> > > This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
> > > are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
> > > not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
> > > If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
> > >
> > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
> > > of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
> > > significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
> > > "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
> > > list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
> > > patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
> > > tags received on the version they apply.
> > >
> > > Full context and explanation:
> > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
> > > </form letter>
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > I wanted to follow up on the patch I submitted. I was wondering if you
> > had a chance to review it and if there are any comments or feedback.
>
> And what did you quote? What's there? Did you read it before replying?
>
> Please avoid pinging during the merge window.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Hello Krzysztof,

Apologies for the unnecessary follow-up. I’ll avoid pinging during the 
merge window.