Re: [PATCH 05/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Fix qcom,freq-domain

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Fri Apr 04 2025 - 16:28:26 EST

Next message: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools build: Don't set libunwind as available if test-all.c build succeeds"
Previous message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [PATCH v2] objtool: Fix SYSCALL instruction handling and INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH"
In reply to: Rob Herring (Arm): "[PATCH 05/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Fix qcom,freq-domain"
Next in thread: Rob Herring (Arm): "[PATCH 06/19] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939: Fix CPU node "enable-method" property dependencies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4/4/25 4:59 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> The correct property name is 'qcom,freq-domain', not
> 'qcom,freq-domains'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Thanks for spotting this!

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Konrad

Next message: Namhyung Kim: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] tools build: Don't set libunwind as available if test-all.c build succeeds"
Previous message: Josh Poimboeuf: "Re: [PATCH v2] objtool: Fix SYSCALL instruction handling and INSN_CONTEXT_SWITCH"
In reply to: Rob Herring (Arm): "[PATCH 05/19] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: Fix qcom,freq-domain"
Next in thread: Rob Herring (Arm): "[PATCH 06/19] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939: Fix CPU node "enable-method" property dependencies"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]