On 3/29/25 8:17 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:53:10 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
we received a bug report showing the regression on 6.13.1 kernel
against 6.13.0. The symptom is that Chrome and VSCode stopped working
with Gnome Scaling, as reported on openSUSE Tumbleweed bug tracker
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236943
Quoting from there:
"""
I use the latest TW on Gnome with a 4K display and 150%
scaling. Everything has been working fine, but recently both Chrome
and VSCode (installed from official non-openSUSE channels) stopped
working with Scaling.
....
I am using VSCode with:
`--enable-features=UseOzonePlatform --enable-features=WaylandWindowDecorations --ozone-platform-hint=auto` and for Chrome, I select `Preferred Ozone platform` == `Wayland`.
"""
Surprisingly, the bisection pointed to the backport of the commit
b9b588f22a0c049a14885399e27625635ae6ef91 ("libfs: Use d_children list
to iterate simple_offset directories").
Indeed, the revert of this patch on the latest 6.13.4 was confirmed to
fix the issue. Also, the reporter verified that the latest 6.14-rc
release is still affected, too.
For now I have no concrete idea how the patch could break the behavior
of a graphical application like the above. Let us know if you need
something for debugging. (Or at easiest, join to the bugzilla entry
and ask there; or open another bug report at whatever you like.)
BTW, I'll be traveling tomorrow, so my reply will be delayed.
#regzbot introduced: b9b588f22a0c049a14885399e27625635ae6ef91
#regzbot monitor: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236943
After all, this seems to be a bug in Chrome and its variant, which was
surfaced by the kernel commit above: as the commit changes the
directory enumeration, it also changed the list order returned from
libdrm drmGetDevices2(), and it screwed up the application that worked
casually beforehand. That said, the bug itself has been already
present. The Chrome upstream tracker:
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/396434686
#regzbot invalid: problem has always existed on Chrome and related code
Thank you very much for your report and for chasing this to conclusion.Doesn’t marking this an invalid contradict Linux’ no regression policy to never break user space, so users can always update the Linux kernel? Shouldn’t this commit still be reverted, and another way be found keeping the old ordering?