Re: [PATCH] script: modpost: require a MODULE_DESCRIPTION()

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Sun, Apr 6, 2025, at 17:59, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:49:02PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> Since commit 1fffe7a34c89 ("script: modpost: emit a warning when the
>> description is missing"), a module without a MODULE_DESCRIPTION() has
>> resulted in a warning with make W=1. Since that time, all known
>> instances of this issue have been fixed. Therefore, now make it an
>> error if a MODULE_DESCRIPTION() is not present.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> did my treewide cleanup for v6.11, Arnd had a few more stragglers that
>> he was going to fix. I hope that by posting, some of the 0-day bots
>> will pick it up and hopefully provide some feedback.
>> 
>> Note: I'm not really sure if *all* of these have been fixed. After I
>
> FWIW, I ran
>
> for f in $(find . -name '*.c'); do grep -q MODULE_LICENSE $f && (grep 
> -q MODULE_DESCRIPTION $f || echo $f); done
>
> That reports a large number of files (111, to be exact) with MODULE_LICENSE
> but not MODULE_DESCRIPTION. I cross-checked a few, and found that many can
> be built as module. The fall-out from this patch might be interesting.

The ones I sent were only the result of what I found from randconfig
builds on x86, arm32 and arm64, so I likely missed drivers that are
specific to other architectures, or that are very unlikely to be
in loadable modules because of random 'select FOO' Kconfig statements
leading to them being always built-in in practice.

        Arnd