Re: [PATCH] memcg, oom: do not bypass oom killer for dying tasks

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Michal Hocko wrote:

> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> 7775face2079 ("memcg: killed threads should not invoke memcg OOM killer") has added
> a bypass of the oom killer path for dying threads because a very
> specific workload (described in the changelog) could hit "no killable
> tasks" path. This itself is not fatal condition but it could be annoying
> if this was a common case.
> 
> On the other hand the bypass has some issues on its own. Without
> triggering oom killer we won't be able to trigger async oom reclaim
> (oom_reaper) which can operate on killed tasks as well as long as they
> still have their mm available. This could be the case during futex
> cleanup when the memory as pointed out by Johannes in [1]. The said case
> is still not fully understood but let's drop this bypass that was mostly
> driven by an artificial workload and allow dying tasks to go into oom
> path. This will make the code easier to reason about and also help
> corner cases where oom_reaper could help to release memory.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241212183012.GB1026@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
> 
> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>