Re: [PATCH 1/6] pwm: Let pwm_set_waveform() succeed even if lowlevel driver rounded up

[Trevor Gamblin]

On 2025-04-05 05:27, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Waveform parameters are supposed to be rounded down to the next value
> possible for the hardware. However when a requested value is too small,
> .round_waveform_tohw() is supposed to pick the next bigger value and
> return 1. Let pwm_set_waveform() behave in the same way.
>
> This creates consistency between pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep() with
> exact=false and pwm_round_waveform_might_sleep() +
> pwm_set_waveform_might_sleep() with exact=true.
>
> The PWM_DEBUG rounding check has to be adapted to only trigger if no
> uprounding happend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>