Re: [PATCH 18/19] dt-bindings: arm/cpus: Add power-domains constraints

[Ulf Hansson]

On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 14:49, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:30 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 05:06, Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The "power-domains" and "power-domains-names" properties are missing any
> > > > constraints. Add the constraints and drop the generic descriptions.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 8 ++------
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> > > > index 6f74ebfd38df..5bd5822db8af 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml
> > > > @@ -313,19 +313,15 @@ properties:
> > > >      maxItems: 1
> > > >
> > > >    power-domains:
> > > > -    description:
> > > > -      List of phandles and PM domain specifiers, as defined by bindings of the
> > > > -      PM domain provider (see also ../power_domain.txt).
> > > > +    maxItems: 1
> > >
> > > There are more than one in some cases. The most is probably three, I think.
> > >
> >
> > +1, there are users using "perf" and "psci" together now.
>
> Where? That's just wrong.

For SCMI for example, but other QC platforms use it too.

"psci" is for CPU power management - we discussed the bad name "psci"
before, but as it's already widely deployed maybe leave it as is? A
better name would be "power", or something along those lines.
"perf" is for CPU performance scaling.

Kind regards
Uffe