Re: [PATCH 09/19] arm: dts: qcom: sdx55/sdx65: Fix CPU power-domain-names

[Ulf Hansson]

On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 22:41, Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 4/4/25 4:59 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > "rpmhpd" is not documented nor used anywhere. As the enable-method is
> > "psci" use "psci" for the power-domain name.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> "psci" is what we want here, but these platforms require some more
> massaging..

So this isn't for CPU performance scaling?

>
> These SoCs don't seem to have any PSCI idle states (deeper than WFI)
> described, which is no bueno, as they support some..

If PSCI PC mode is the only supported CPU suspend mode, we don't need
the power-domain topology to be described in DT as it's optional to
use.

Is this a PC or OSI based platform?

>
> I'll try to improve this.
>
> Konrad
>

Kind regards
Uffe