Re: [PATCH v7 35/45] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace

[Steven Price]

On 04/03/2025 23:45, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 2/14/25 2:14 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The RMM describes the maximum number of BPs/WPs available to the guest
>> in the Feature Register 0. Propagate those numbers into ID_AA64DFR0_EL1,
>> which is visible to userspace. A VMM needs this information in order to
>> set up realm parameters.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h |  2 ++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c             | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c        |  2 +-
>>   3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> With the following one nitpick addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>> asm/kvm_rme.h
>> index d684b30493f5..67ee38541a82 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ void kvm_init_rme(void);
>>   u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void);
>>   u32 kvm_realm_vgic_nr_lr(void);
>>   +u64 kvm_realm_reset_id_aa64dfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> u64 val);
>> +
>>   bool kvm_rme_supports_sve(void);
>>     int kvm_realm_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap
>> *cap);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> index f83f34358832..8c426f575728 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c
>> @@ -87,6 +87,28 @@ u32 kvm_realm_vgic_nr_lr(void)
>>       return u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0,
>> RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_GICV3_NUM_LRS);
>>   }
>>   +u64 kvm_realm_reset_id_aa64dfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> u64 val)
>> +{
>> +    u32 bps = u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0,
>> RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_NUM_BPS);
>> +    u32 wps = u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0,
>> RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_NUM_WPS);
>> +    u32 ctx_cmps;
>> +
>> +    if (!kvm_is_realm(vcpu->kvm))
>> +        return val;
>> +
>> +    /* Ensure CTX_CMPs is still valid */
>> +    ctx_cmps = FIELD_GET(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_CTX_CMPs, val);
>> +    ctx_cmps = min(bps, ctx_cmps);
>> +
>> +    val &= ~(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRPs_MASK | ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_MASK |
>> +         ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_CTX_CMPs);
>> +    val |= FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRPs_MASK, bps) |
>> +           FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_MASK, wps) |
>> +           FIELD_PREP(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_CTX_CMPs, ctx_cmps);
>> +
>> +    return val;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> The chunk of code can be squeezed to
> sys_reg.c::sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1() since
> sys_reg.c has been plumbed for realm, no reason to keep a separate
> helper in rme.c
> because it's only called by sys_reg.c::sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1()

The issue here is the rmm_feat_reg0 variable - it's currently static in
rme.c - so I can't just shift the code over. I could obviously provide
helpers to get the necessary information but this seemed cleaner.

Thanks,
Steve

>>   static int get_start_level(struct realm *realm)
>>   {
>>       return 4 - ((realm->ia_bits - 8) / (RMM_PAGE_SHIFT - 3));
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index ed881725eb64..5618eff33155 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -1820,7 +1820,7 @@ static u64 sanitise_id_aa64dfr0_el1(const struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
>>       /* Hide BRBE from guests */
>>       val &= ~ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRBE_MASK;
>>   -    return val;
>> +    return kvm_realm_reset_id_aa64dfr0_el1(vcpu, val);
>>   }
>>     static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>