Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] x86/sev: register tpm-svsm platform device

[Stefano Garzarella]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 01:00:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:09:42PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > @@ -2697,6 +2702,9 @@ static int __init snp_init_platform_device(void)
> >  	if (platform_device_register(&sev_guest_device))
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> >
> > +	if (platform_device_register(&tpm_svsm_device))
> > +		return -ENODEV;
>
> So I don't understand the design here:
>
> You've exported the probe function - snp_svsm_vtpm_probe() - and you're
> calling it in tpm_svsm_probe().
>
> So why aren't you registering the platform device there too but are doing this
> unconditional strange thing here?

We discussed a bit on v3, but I'm open to change it:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/nrn4ur66lz2ocbkkjl2bgiex3xbp552szerfhalsaefunqxf7p@ki7xf66zrf6u/

 I tried to keep the logic of whether or not the driver is needed all in 
 the tpm_svsm_probe()/snp_svsm_vtpm_probe() (where I check for SVSM).
 If you prefer to move some pieces here, though, I'm open.

Thanks,
Stefano