Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: pid_namespace: Add missing sys/mount.h

From: T.J. Mercier
Date: Wed Apr 09 2025 - 12:23:33 EST


On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:53 AM Peter Seiderer <ps.report@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello T.J.,
>
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2025 23:02:02 +0000, "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > pid_max.c: In function ‘pid_max_cb’:
> > pid_max.c:42:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mount’
> > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 42 | ret = mount("", "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, 0);
> > | ^~~~~
> > pid_max.c:42:36: error: ‘MS_PRIVATE’ undeclared (first use in this
> > function); did you mean ‘MAP_PRIVATE’?
> > 42 | ret = mount("", "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, 0);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~
> > | MAP_PRIVATE
> > pid_max.c:42:49: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first use in this function)
> > 42 | ret = mount("", "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, 0);
> > | ^~~~~~
> > pid_max.c:48:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘umount2’; did
> > you mean ‘SYS_umount2’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > 48 | umount2("/proc", MNT_DETACH);
> > | ^~~~~~~
> > | SYS_umount2
> > pid_max.c:48:26: error: ‘MNT_DETACH’ undeclared (first use in this
> > function)
> > 48 | umount2("/proc", MNT_DETACH);
> >
> > Fixes: 615ab43b838b ("tests/pid_namespace: add pid_max tests")
> > Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c b/tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c
> > index 51c414faabb0..96f274f0582b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include <syscall.h>
> > +#include <sys/mount.h>
> > #include <sys/wait.h>
> >
> > #include "../kselftest_harness.h"
>
> Predated patch already available, see
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250115105211.390370-3-ps.report@xxxxxxx/
>
> Regards,
> Peter

Thanks Peter, looks like that was never taken into anybody's tree?

You can have my:
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>