Re: [PATCH 09/19] arm: dts: qcom: sdx55/sdx65: Fix CPU power-domain-names

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 4/7/25 6:27 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 22:41, Konrad Dybcio
> <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/4/25 4:59 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>> "rpmhpd" is not documented nor used anywhere. As the enable-method is
>>> "psci" use "psci" for the power-domain name.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> "psci" is what we want here, but these platforms require some more
>> massaging..
> 
> So this isn't for CPU performance scaling?

Nope!

> 
>>
>> These SoCs don't seem to have any PSCI idle states (deeper than WFI)
>> described, which is no bueno, as they support some..
> 
> If PSCI PC mode is the only supported CPU suspend mode, we don't need
> the power-domain topology to be described in DT as it's optional to
> use.
> 
> Is this a PC or OSI based platform?
Unfortunately it seems like only PC mode is implemented.

Konrad