On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 09:45:47AM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
On 10. 04. 25 9:06 dop., Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 04:42:38PM GMT, Ivan Vecera wrote:
Add DT bindings for Microchip Azurite DPLL chip family. These chips
provides 2 independent DPLL channels, up to 10 differential or
single-ended inputs and up to 20 differential or 20 single-ended outputs.
It can be connected via I2C or SPI busses.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-i2c.yaml | 74 ++++++++++++++++++
.../bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-spi.yaml | 77 +++++++++++++++++++
No, you do not get two files. No such bindings were accepted since some
years.
2 files changed, 151 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-i2c.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-spi.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-i2c.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..d9280988f9eb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-i2c.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/dpll/microchip,zl3073x-i2c.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: I2C-attached Microchip Azurite DPLL device
+
+maintainers:
+ - Ivan Vecera <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>
+
+description:
+ Microchip Azurite DPLL (ZL3073x) is a family of DPLL devices that
+ provides 2 independent DPLL channels, up to 10 differential or
+ single-ended inputs and up to 20 differential or 20 single-ended outputs.
+ It can be connected via multiple busses, one of them being I2C.
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - microchip,zl3073x-i2c
I already said: you have one compatible, not two. One.
Ah, you mean something like:
iio/accel/adi,adxl313.yaml
Do you?
Also, still wildcard, so still a no.
This is not wildcard, Microchip uses this to designate DPLL devices with the
same characteristics.
That's the very definition of a wildcard, no? The x is matching against
several different devices. There's like 14 different parts matching
zl3073x, with varying numbers of outputs and channels. One compatible
for all of that hardly seems suitable.
But I can use microchip,azurite, is it more appropriate?
No, I think that is worse actually.