[tip: x86/alternatives] x86/alternatives: Remove the 'addr == NULL means forced-flush' hack from smp_text_poke_batch_finish()/smp_text_poke_batch_flush()/text_poke_addr_ordered()

From: tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Apr 11 2025 - 06:08:39 EST


The following commit has been merged into the x86/alternatives branch of tip:

Commit-ID: eaa24c9177c8c765ec9b9ccab392ac07ae8acda0
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/eaa24c9177c8c765ec9b9ccab392ac07ae8acda0
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 07:40:35 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:01:34 +02:00

x86/alternatives: Remove the 'addr == NULL means forced-flush' hack from smp_text_poke_batch_finish()/smp_text_poke_batch_flush()/text_poke_addr_ordered()

There's this weird hack used by smp_text_poke_batch_finish() to indicate
a 'forced flush':

smp_text_poke_batch_flush(NULL);

Just open-code the vector-flush in a straightforward fashion:

smp_text_poke_batch_process(tp_vec, tp_vec_nr);
tp_vec_nr = 0;

And get rid of !addr hack from text_poke_addr_ordered().

Leave a WARN_ON_ONCE(), just in case some external code learned
to rely on this behavior.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250411054105.2341982-24-mingo@xxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index c5801b4..16a41e2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -2845,12 +2845,11 @@ static bool text_poke_addr_ordered(void *addr)
{
struct smp_text_poke_loc *tp;

+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!addr);
+
if (!tp_vec_nr)
return true;

- if (!addr) /* force */
- return false;
-
/*
* If the last current entry's address is higher than the
* new entry's address we'd like to add, then ordering
@@ -2864,6 +2863,14 @@ static bool text_poke_addr_ordered(void *addr)
return true;
}

+void smp_text_poke_batch_finish(void)
+{
+ if (tp_vec_nr) {
+ smp_text_poke_batch_process(tp_vec, tp_vec_nr);
+ tp_vec_nr = 0;
+ }
+}
+
static void smp_text_poke_batch_flush(void *addr)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);
@@ -2874,11 +2881,6 @@ static void smp_text_poke_batch_flush(void *addr)
}
}

-void smp_text_poke_batch_finish(void)
-{
- smp_text_poke_batch_flush(NULL);
-}
-
void __ref smp_text_poke_batch_add(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len, const void *emulate)
{
struct smp_text_poke_loc *tp;