Re: [PATCH V3 5/9] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init()

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 13:42, Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/11/2025 1:39 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 02:30:58PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> >> Simplify the qcom ufs phy driver by inlining qmp_ufs_com_init() into
> >> qmp_ufs_power_on(). This change removes unnecessary function calls and
> >> ensures that the initialization logic is directly within the power-on
> >> routine, maintaining the same functionality.
> >
> > Which problem is this patch trying to solve?
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> As part of the patch, I simplified the code by moving qmp_ufs_com_init
> inline to qmp_ufs_power_on, since qmp_ufs_power_on was merely calling
> qmp_ufs_com_init. This change eliminates unnecessary function call.

You again are describing what you did. Please start by stating the
problem or the issue.

>
> Regards,
> Nitin
>
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 44 ++++++++++---------------
> >>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> >> index 12dad28cc1bd..2cc819089d71 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> >> @@ -1757,31 +1757,6 @@ static void qmp_ufs_init_registers(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg
> >>      qmp_ufs_init_all(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_b);
> >>   }
> >>
> >> -static int qmp_ufs_com_init(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
> >> -{
> >> -    const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
> >> -    void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs;
> >> -    int ret;
> >> -
> >> -    ret = regulator_bulk_enable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs);
> >> -    if (ret) {
> >> -            dev_err(qmp->dev, "failed to enable regulators, err=%d\n", ret);
> >> -            return ret;
> >> -    }
> >> -
> >> -    ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(qmp->num_clks, qmp->clks);
> >> -    if (ret)
> >> -            goto err_disable_regulators;
> >> -
> >> -    qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRDN);
> >> -
> >> -    return 0;
> >> -
> >> -err_disable_regulators:
> >> -    regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs);
> >> -
> >> -    return ret;
> >> -}
> >>
> >>   static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
> >>   {
> >> @@ -1799,10 +1774,27 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
> >>   static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> >>   {
> >>      struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> >> +    const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
> >> +    void __iomem *pcs = qmp->pcs;
> >>      int ret;
> >> +
> >>      dev_vdbg(qmp->dev, "Initializing QMP phy\n");
> >>
> >> -    ret = qmp_ufs_com_init(qmp);
> >> +    ret = regulator_bulk_enable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs);
> >> +    if (ret) {
> >> +            dev_err(qmp->dev, "failed to enable regulators, err=%d\n", ret);
> >> +            return ret;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(qmp->num_clks, qmp->clks);
> >> +    if (ret)
> >> +            goto err_disable_regulators;
> >> +
> >> +    qphy_setbits(pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL], SW_PWRDN);
> >> +    return 0;
> >> +
> >> +err_disable_regulators:
> >> +    regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs);
> >>      return ret;
> >>   }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.48.1
> >>
> >
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry