Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] ftrace: Add support for function argument to graph tracer

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 01:17:45PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > We've been seeing the PID filters selftest failing for a while on
> > several arm64 systems, a bisect I managed to run without running into
> > any confounding issues pointed to this patch which is in mainline as
> > ff5c9c576e75.  It's in the ftrace code, but I'm not immediately seeing
> > the relevance.  Output from a failing run:

> Hmm, I wonder if there's junk being added into the trace.

> Can you add this patch, and show me the output when it fails again?

# # + cat trace
# # # tracer: function_graph
# # #
# # # CPU  TASK/PID         DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
# # # |     |    |           |   |                     |   |   |   |
# # 0)  ftracet-5190  | ! 537.633 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x1470 */
# # 
# # 0)  ftracet-5190  | ! 508.253 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x1471 */
# # 
# # 0)  ftracet-5190  | ! 215.716 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x1476 */
# # 
# # 0)  ftracet-5190  | ! 493.890 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x147b */
# # 
# # + fail PID filtering not working?

...

# # + cat trace
# # # tracer: function_graph
# # #
# # # CPU  TASK/PID         DURATION                  FUNCTION CALLS
# # # |     |    |           |   |                     |   |   |   |
# # 0) ftracet-12279  | ! 598.118 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x301f */
# # 
# # 0) ftracet-12279  | ! 492.539 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x3020 */
# # 
# # 0) ftracet-12279  | ! 231.104 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x3025 */
# # 
# # 0) ftracet-12279  | ! 555.566 us  |  kernel_clone(); /* ret=0x302a */
# # 
# # + fail PID filtering not working?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature