Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pidfs: ensure consistent ENOENT/ESRCH reporting

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 04/11, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> I'm verbose. I hope you can live with it:
>
>         /*
>          * While holding the pidfd waitqueue lock removing the task
>          * linkage for the thread-group leader pid (PIDTYPE_TGID) isn't
>          * possible. Thus, if there's still task linkage for PIDTYPE_PID
>          * not having thread-group leader linkage for the pid means it
>          * wasn't a thread-group leader in the first place.
>          */
>
> :)

LGTM ;)

Oleg.