Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ionic: support ethtool get_module_eeprom_by_page
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Sun Apr 13 2025 - 16:59:02 EST
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:21:39AM -0700, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> Add support for the newer get_module_eeprom_by_page interface.
> Only the upper half of the 256 byte page is available for
> reading, and the firmware puts the two sections into the
> extended sprom buffer, so a union is used over the extended
> sprom buffer to make clear which page is to be accessed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_ethtool.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_if.h | 12 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_ethtool.c
> index 66f172e28f8b..25dca4b36bcf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_ethtool.c
> @@ -1052,6 +1052,55 @@ static int ionic_get_module_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int ionic_get_module_eeprom_by_page(struct net_device *netdev,
> + const struct ethtool_module_eeprom *page_data,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct ionic_lif *lif = netdev_priv(netdev);
> + struct ionic_dev *idev = &lif->ionic->idev;
> + u32 err = -EINVAL;
> + u8 *src;
> +
> + if (!page_data->length)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (page_data->bank != 0) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Only bank 0 is supported");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (page_data->offset < 128 && page_data->page != 0) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "High side only for pages other than 0");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This is in the core already.
> +
> + if ((page_data->length + page_data->offset) > 256) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Read past the end of the page");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Also in the core.
> +
> + switch (page_data->page) {
> + case 0:
> + src = &idev->port_info->status.xcvr.sprom[page_data->offset];
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + src = &idev->port_info->sprom_page1[page_data->offset - 128];
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + src = &idev->port_info->sprom_page2[page_data->offset - 128];
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
It is a valid page, your firmware just does not support it. EOPNOSUPP.
> + }
> +
> + memset(page_data->data, 0, page_data->length);
> + err = ionic_do_module_copy(page_data->data, src, page_data->length);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return page_data->length;
> +}
> +
> static int ionic_get_ts_info(struct net_device *netdev,
> struct kernel_ethtool_ts_info *info)
> {
> @@ -1199,6 +1248,7 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops ionic_ethtool_ops = {
> .set_tunable = ionic_set_tunable,
> .get_module_info = ionic_get_module_info,
> .get_module_eeprom = ionic_get_module_eeprom,
> + .get_module_eeprom_by_page = ionic_get_module_eeprom_by_page,
If i remember correctly, implementing .get_module_eeprom_by_page make
.get_module_info and .get_module_eeprom pointless, they will never be
used, so you can delete them.
Andrew