Re: [PATCH] property: Use tidy for_each_named_* macros

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 02:52:00PM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Implementing if-conditions inside for_each_x() macros requires some
> thinking to avoid side effects in the calling code. Resulting code
> may look somewhat awkward, and there are couple of different ways it is
> usually done.
> 
> Standardizing this to one way can help making it more obvious for a code
> reader and writer. The newly added for_each_if() is a way to achieve this.
> 
> Use for_each_if() to make these macros look like many others which
> should in the long run help reading the code.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for cleaning these up!

> ---
> The patch was crafted against the IIO/testing branch, and it depends on
> the 76125d7801e5 ("property: Add functions to iterate named child").
> Hence I'd suggest taking this via IIO tree (if this gets accepted).

I'm not sure why. The for_each_if() is part of v6.15-rc1.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko