Re: [PATCH RFC v5 1/8] media: qcom: iris: move sm8250 to gen1 catalog

From: Dmitry Baryshkov
Date: Mon Apr 14 2025 - 05:28:52 EST


On 14/04/2025 12:07, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 14/04/2025 09:39, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 10:14:02AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 10/04/2025 21:44, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 06:30:00PM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
Re-organize the platform support core into a gen1 catalog C file
declaring common platform structure and include platform headers
containing platform specific entries and iris_platform_data
structure.

The goal is to share most of the structure while having
clear and separate per-SoC catalog files.

The organization is based on the current drm/msm dpu1 catalog
entries.

Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/Makefile          |  2 +-
   .../media/platform/qcom/iris/iris_catalog_gen1.c   | 83 ++++++++ ++++++++++++++
   ...ris_platform_sm8250.c => iris_catalog_sm8250.h} | 80 + +-------------------

I'd suggest _not_ to follow DPU here. I like the per-generation files,
but please consider keeping platform files as separate C files too.

This would duplicate all tables, do we really want this ?

No. Keep the tables that are shared in iris_catalog_gen1.c, keep
platform data in iris_catalog_sm8250.c and iris_catalog_sm8550.c (and
later iris_catalog_sm8650.c)

This won't work, we need ARRAY_SIZE() for most of the tables

I see. Can you do it other way around: export platform-specific data from the iris_catalog_sm8250.c and use it inside iris_catalog_gen1.c?


Neil



I want just to add SM8650 support, not to entirely rework the
whole iris driver.

Neil


   3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)







--
With best wishes
Dmitry