On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 16:31, Daniel Vacek <neelx@xxxxxxxx> wrote:[...]
I'd still opt for keeping full range and functionality including
negative levels using the plain `zstd:N` option and having the other
just as an additional alias (for maybe being a bit nicer to some
humans, but not a big deal really and a matter of preference).
Checking the official documentation, it still mentions "negative
compression levels" being the fast option.
https://facebook.github.io/zstd/
https://facebook.github.io/zstd/zstd_manual.html
The deprecation part looks like just some gossip. It looks more about
the cli tool api and we are defining a kernel mount api - perfectly
unrelated.
Any feedback, Dave? I tend to drop this ida of `zstd-fast` alias.
We can make this change before 6.15 final so it's not in any released
kernel and we don't have to deal with compatibility.