On 15.04.25 07:47, Oscar Salvador wrote:
commit 4eeec8c89a0c ("mm: move hugetlb specific things in folio to page[3]")
shifted hugetlb specific stuff, and now mapping overlaps _hugetlb_cgroup field.
_hugetlb_cgroup is set to NULL when preparing the hugetlb page in
init_new_hugetlb_folio().
For a better picture, this is page->mapping before and after the comming
for the first three tail pages:
before:
page: fffff51a44358040 0000000000000000
page: fffff51a44358080 0000000000000000
page: fffff51a443580c0 dead000000000400
after:
page: fffff1f0042b0040 0000000000000000
page: fffff1f0042b0080 fffff1f0042b0090
page: fffff1f0042b00c0 0000000000000000
Tail#2 has fffff1f0042b0090 because of the _deferred_list initialization,
which was also shifted, but that is not a problem.
For HVO, upon restoring that gets copied in some tail pages (reset_struct_pages)
and so those tail pages will not have TAIL_MAPPING set and the check
in free_tail_page_prepare() will fail:
kernel: BUG: Bad page state in process kworker/0:3 pfn:10ac40
kernel: page does not match folio
kernel: page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x10ac40
kernel: flags: 0x17ffffc0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
kernel: raw: 0017ffffc0000000 fffff1f0042b0000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
kernel: raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000
kernel: page dumped because: corrupted mapping in tail page
Reset _hugetlb_cgroup to TAIL_MAPPING before restoring so tail pages have the
right value.
Hi,
To handle that for ordinary hugtlb alloc/free I added in that patch in free_tail_page_prepare():
case 3:
/* the third tail page: hugetlb specifics overlap ->mappings */
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE))
break;
fallthrough;
default:
if (page->mapping != TAIL_MAPPING) {
bad_page(page, "corrupted mapping in tail page");
goto out;
}
break;
}
Now I am confused why that check doesn't catch that?
Apparently only a problem with HVO? Because I recall testing the ordinary alloc/free.