Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Add null pointer check to pick_next_entity()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 03:57:42PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-04-02 at 10:22 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Please confirm what the reason for overflow is.
> > 
> Running a large enough sample size has its benefits.
> 
> We have hit 3 out of the 4 warnings below.
> 
> The only one we did not hit is the cfs_rq->avg_load != avg_load
> warning.

Fair enough, that one really isn't hard.

> Most of the time we seem to hit the warnings from the
> code that removes tasks from the runqueue, 

*blink*..

> but we are
> occasionally seeing it when adding tasks to the runqueue,
> as well.

OK, let me try and get my head around that.