Re: [PATCH V10 13/15] rust: cpufreq: Extend abstractions for driver registration

[Viresh Kumar]

On 16-04-25, 11:04, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> You need to justify why drv is a valid pointer to be passed to
> cpufreq_register_driver(), i.e. something like
> 
> 	// SAFETY:
> 	// - `drv` comes from Self::VTABLE and hence is a valid pointer to a `struct cpufreq_driver`,
> 	// - `cpufreq_register_driver()` never attempts to modify the data `drv` points to

The cpufreq core can try to change the data pointed by `drv`. For now
it updates the `cpufreq_driver->boost_enabled` flag.

-- 
viresh