Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Introduce task_*() helpers for PF_ flags

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  - We might want to add set_task_*() helpers as well, to totally 
>    encapsulate PF_ uses. Maybe. I dislike how close it is to the 
>    existing set_tsk*() methods that manipulate TIF_ flags. The 
>    dichotomy between the TIF_ and PF_ space isn't really sensible these 
>    days I think on a conceptual level - although merging them is 
>    probably not practical due to possibly running out of easy 64-bit 
>    word width.

And yeah, the TIF_ space is per arch to a substantial degree, and is 
accessed from assembly code, plus is often operated on atomically, 
while the PF_ space is nicely generic and non-atomic - but still we 
could do better to express that these two per task flag spaces are 
rather similar in purpose, instead of this historic 'task/process' 
distinction that isn't actually true.

Thanks,

	Ingo