Re: [PATCH] mm: Add ARCH_FORCE_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER to select page block order

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25:11PM -0700, Juan Yescas wrote:
> Problem: On large page size configurations (16KiB, 64KiB), the CMA
> alignment requirement (CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES) increases considerably,
> and this causes the CMA reservations to be larger than necessary.
> This means that system will have less available MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE and
> MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE page blocks since MIGRATE_CMA can't fallback to them.
> 
> The CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES increases because it depends on
> MAX_PAGE_ORDER which depends on ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. The value of
> ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER increases on 16k and 64k kernels.

Sure, but why would any architecture *NOT* want to set this?
This seems like you're making each architecture bump into the problem
by itself, when the real problem is that the CMA people never thought
about this and should have come up with better defaults.