Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/11] bpf: Move insn if/else into do_check_insn()
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Date: Thu May 01 2025 - 18:07:03 EST
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 09:43, Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This is required to catch the errors later and fall back to a nospec if
> on a speculative path.
>
> Eliminate the regs variable as it is only used once and insn_idx is not
> modified in-between the definition and usage.
>
> Still pass insn simply to match the other check_*() functions. As Eduard
> points out [1], insn is assumed to correspond to env->insn_idx in many
> places (e.g, __check_reg_arg()).
>
> Move code into do_check_insn(), replace
> * "continue" with "return 0" after modifying insn_idx
> * "goto process_bpf_exit" with "return PROCESS_BPF_EXIT"
> * "do_print_state = " with "*do_print_state = "
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/293dbe3950a782b8eb3b87b71d7a967e120191fd.camel@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Henriette Herzog <henriette.herzog@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Maximilian Ott <ott@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Milan Stephan <milan.stephan@xxxxxx>
> ---
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@xxxxxxxxx>