Re: [PATCH] HID: sensor-hub: Fix typo and improve documentation for sensor_hub_remove_callback()
From: David Lechner
Date: Thu May 01 2025 - 19:52:25 EST
On 5/1/25 6:33 PM, chelsy ratnawat wrote:
> Hi,
Watch out for HTML mail! The mailing list and other automated tools will reject
it, so some people won't see the whole conversation.
> Thanks for the feedback. Regarding your comments:
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 12:47 AM David Lechner <dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dlechner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> On 4/30/25 1:23 PM, Chelsy Ratnawat wrote:
> > Fixed a typo in "registered" and improved grammar for better readability
> > and consistency with kernel-doc standards. No functional changes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chelsy Ratnawat <chelsyratnawat2001@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:chelsyratnawat2001@xxxxxxxxx>>
> > ---
> > include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h b/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h
> > index c27329e2a5ad..5d2ac79429d4 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/hid-sensor-hub.h
> > @@ -130,10 +130,11 @@ int sensor_hub_register_callback(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> > /**
> > * sensor_hub_remove_callback() - Remove client callbacks
>
> This says "callbacks", so is it possible to have more than one registered at a
> time?
>
>
> Regarding the use of "callback" instead of "callbacks", what I understand is-
> - The function `sensor_hub_register_callback()` ensures that only one callback is registered for each `(hsdev, usage_id)` pair. If another callback is registered for the same `(hsdev, usage_id)`, it returns `-EINVAL`.
> - Therefore, `sensor_hub_remove_callback()` is designed to remove that single registered callback for a given `(hsdev, usage_id)` pair. The function does not need to handle multiple callbacks for the same pair, as only one
> callback is registered at a time.
>
> Please let me know if my understanding is correct, or if you have any additional feedback or suggestions.
Based on the reply from Srinivas, it sounds like you understand correctly.