Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] Sched: Add tracepoint for sched time slice extension

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Fri May 02 2025 - 07:02:37 EST

Next message: Jarkko Nikula: "Re: [1/1] i2c: designware: Ensure runtime suspend is invoked during rapid slave unregistration and registration"
Previous message: David Sterba: "Re: [PATCH] btrfs: remove extent buffer's redundant `len` member field"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] Sched: Add tracepoint for sched time slice extension"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] Sched: Add tracepoint for sched time slice extension"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2025-05-02 11:14:34 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This is horrific coding style. But really why do we need this? I'm not,
> in general, a fan of tracepoints.

I suggested a tracepoint so that we see why the NEED_RESCHED flag
disappeared. The trace would show a wakeup, the need_resched flag would
be set and the flag would disappear without an explanation.

Sebastian

Next message: Jarkko Nikula: "Re: [1/1] i2c: designware: Ensure runtime suspend is invoked during rapid slave unregistration and registration"
Previous message: David Sterba: "Re: [PATCH] btrfs: remove extent buffer's redundant `len` member field"
In reply to: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] Sched: Add tracepoint for sched time slice extension"
Next in thread: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] Sched: Add tracepoint for sched time slice extension"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]