Re: [PATCH v8 0/2] memcg: Fix test_memcg_min/low test failures

[Tejun Heo]

On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 09:04:41PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> v8:
>  - Ignore the low event count of child 2 with memory_recursiveprot on
>    in patch 1 as originally suggested by Michal.
> 
> v7:
>  - Skip the vmscan change as the mem_cgroup_usage() check for now as
>    it is currently redundant.
> 
> v6:
>  - The memcg_test_low failure is indeed due to the memory_recursiveprot
>    mount option which is enabled by default in systemd cgroup v2 setting.
>    So adopt Michal's suggestion to adjust the low event checking
>    according to whether memory_recursiveprot is enabled or not.
> 
> The test_memcontrol selftest consistently fails its test_memcg_low
> sub-test (with memory_recursiveprot enabled) and sporadically fails
> its test_memcg_min sub-test. This patchset fixes the test_memcg_min
> and test_memcg_low failures by adjusting the test_memcontrol selftest
> to fix these test failures.
> 
> Waiman Long (2):
>   selftests: memcg: Allow low event with no memory.low and
>     memory_recursiveprot on
>   selftests: memcg: Increase error tolerance of child memory.current
>     check in test_memcg_protection()

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Probably best to go through -mm? If cgroup would be better, please let me
know.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun