Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] drivers: clk: tegra: add DFLL support for Tegra 4
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sun May 04 2025 - 13:11:37 EST
On 04/05/2025 18:25, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
> нд, 4 трав. 2025 р. о 19:23 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> пише:
>>
>> On 03/05/2025 10:54, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote:
>>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause */
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * This header provides Tegra114-specific constants for binding
>>>>> + * nvidia,tegra114-car.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_TEGRA114_CAR_H
>>>>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_RESET_TEGRA114_CAR_H
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define TEGRA114_RESET(x) (5 * 32 + (x))
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Does not look like a binding, but some sort of register. Binding IDs
>>>> start from 0 (or 1) and are incremented by 1.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hello there!
>>> This file add same logic for Tegra114 as Tegra124 currently
>>> implements, check here
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/include/dt-bindings/reset/tegra124-car.h?h=v6.14.5
>>>
>>> I did not re-use Tegra124 value, though it is same, to avoid confusion
>>> in main Tegra114 device tree.
>>
>> What confusion? Why would anyone be interested in comparing numbers thus
>> getting confused by different number? These are abstract IDs.
>>
>
> By using TEGRA124_RESET in Tegra114 device tree
Why would you use define from other SoC... and how is it related to my
comment in the first place?
Best regards,
Krzysztof