Re: [V1 2/2] drivers soc: add support for ST stm32mp13xx family

From: Rodolfo Giometti
Date: Mon May 26 2025 - 06:59:42 EST


On 20/05/25 10:55, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
hi

On 5/19/25 15:08, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
This patch adds SoC support for the ST stm32mp13xx family. It also
adds the special attribute "secure" which returns the CPU's secure
mode status.

Signed-off-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/soc/st/Makefile        |   1 +
  drivers/soc/st/soc-stm32mp13.c | 253 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 254 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/st/soc-stm32mp13.c

diff --git a/drivers/soc/st/Makefile b/drivers/soc/st/Makefile
index 6c71607f6c89..c84bf510928d 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/st/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/soc/st/Makefile
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_PM_DOMAINS) += stm32_pm_domain.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RISAB) += stm32_risab.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RISAF) += stm32_risaf.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_STM32MP13) += soc-stm32mp13.o

Your patch does not applied because the file does not exist. You can't take a patch on our github, push it as it is without rebase it on mainline kernel.
OK, my patch set doesn't apply to the vanilla kernel, and I'm going to remove linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx from the recipients list.

Stated this, where should I send my patches? Would the linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx list be a suitable candidate? :)

Ciao,

Rodolfo

--
GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux Device Driver giometti@xxxxxxxx
Embedded Systems phone: +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming