On Fri Jun 20, 2025 at 1:28 PM CEST, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
HiI was mostly asking whether this diff is okay as part of my patch (for
Am 20.06.25 um 13:07 schrieb Luca Weiss:
Hi Thomas,Best is to try to fit it into the <linux/*> block. In simpledrm, it's
On Fri Jun 20, 2025 at 1:02 PM CEST, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
HiThanks for the reviews!
Am 20.06.25 um 12:31 schrieb Luca Weiss:
Some devices might require keeping an interconnect path alive so thatWith alphabetical sorting:
the framebuffer continues working. Add support for that by setting the
bandwidth requirements appropriately for all provided interconnect
paths.
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 83 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
index be95fcddce4c8ca794826b805cd7dad2985bd637..ca73e079fd13550ddc779e84db80f7f9b743d074 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/parser.h>
#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx>
For both simpledrm.c and simplefb.c, the includes are not strictly
alphabetically sorted (1 mis-sort in simpledrm, 3 in simplefb), shall I
just try and slot it into the best fitting place, or make them sorted in
my patch? Or I can add a separate commit for each driver before to sort
them.
Let me know!
probably my mistake. Don't bother with sending an extra cleanup if you
don't want to.
just adding <linux/interconnect.h>)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
index be95fcddce4c..f2efa4b51401 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/simplefb.c
@@ -13,18 +13,19 @@
*/
#include <linux/aperture.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/fb.h>
+#include <linux/interconnect.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
-#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_clk.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/parser.h>
+#include <linux/platform_data/simplefb.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
Or if you want this churn to be a separate commit. Either way is fine
with me, just trying to figure out the preferences of this subsystem :)
Regards
Luca