Re: [PATCH] stacktrace: do not trace user stack for user_worker tasks

[Jens Axboe]

On 6/24/25 11:07 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:59:11 +0800
> Jiazi Li <jqqlijiazi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Tasks with PF_USER_WORKER flag also only run in kernel space,
>> so do not trace user stack for these tasks.
> 
> What exactly is the difference between PF_KTHREAD and PF_USER_WORKER?

One is a kernel thread (eg no mm, etc), the other is basically a user
thread. None of them exit to userspace, that's basically the only
thing they have in common.

> Has all the locations that test for PF_KTHREAD been audited to make
> sure that PF_USER_WORKER isn't also needed?

I did when adding it, to the best of my knowledge. But there certainly
could still be gaps. Sometimes not easy to see why code checks for
PF_KTHREAD in the first place.

> I'm working on other code that needs to differentiate between user
> tasks and kernel tasks, and having to have multiple flags to test is
> becoming quite a burden.

None of them are user tasks, but PF_USER_WORKER does look like a
user thread and acts like one, except it wasn't created by eg
pthread_create() and it never returns to userspace. When it's done,
it's simply reaped.

-- 
Jens Axboe