Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: Update the file list in the TDX entry.

[Dave Hansen]

On 7/8/25 07:24, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> That file list is getting a bit long, but it _is_ the truth.
> What about adding
> 
> K:	tdx
> 
> instead of listing each file individually?  That might also help clarify what's
> up for cases where there is overlap, e.g. with KVM, to convey that this is a
> "secondary" entry of sorts.

Good idea. There are a couple of "tdx" things in the tree that aren't
TDX, but:

N:	tdx
K:	\b(tdx)

seems like it might be a _bit_ more precise. I don't see any filenames
with "tdx" in them that are false positives.