Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: st: fix timer used for ticks

From: Patrick DELAUNAY
Date: Thu Jul 10 2025 - 10:14:59 EST


Hi Mark,

On 5/15/25 15:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2025 14:12:39 +0100,
Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Remove always-on on generic ARM timer as the clock source provided by
STGEN is deactivated in low power mode, STOP1 by example.

Fixes: 5d30d03aaf78 ("arm64: dts: st: introduce stm32mp25 SoCs family")
Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
index 8d87865850a7..74c5f85b800f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ timer {
<GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
<GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
<GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>;
- always-on;
+ arm,no-tick-in-suspend;
That's amusing, because these two properties literally describe
opposite behaviours (from an optimisation to a HW bug).

I'm also pretty sure 99% of the DTs in the tree that have the
always-on property are wrong.

yes it was a bug in the initial device tree, detected when we implement

the low power support in STMicroelectronics downtream.


STGEN, the root source of ARM generic timer in STM32MP25 is stopped in

low power states.



};
soc@0 {
I don't want to sound rude or anything, but the guy you Cc'd on an
@arm.com will not reply (and hasn't been replying for almost 6 years).

your not rude and It is my error, sorry

I search email for "Marc Zyngier " in Linux source tree....

and I use a bad address.


For information, I upstream this patch after the remark on patch by Christian Bruel:

[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: st: add st,stm32mp2-cortex-a7-gic in intc node in stm32mp251.dtsi
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20250403122805.1574086-4-christian.bruel@xxxxxxxxxxx/

>   While reviewing a DT patch of mine related to the interrupt-controller, I had the following

 >  comment from Marc Zyngier (GIC Maintainer) " Then while you're at it, you may want to

 >  consider removing the "always-on" property in the timer, because I'm pretty sure the

  > comparator goes down in low power mode on A53 and A35, and loses its value.

>   In general, only VMs can make use of this property. "




Thanks,

M.


Thanks