Re: [PATCH] mm: skip lru_note_cost() when scanning only file or anon

From: Roman Gushchin
Date: Fri Jul 11 2025 - 14:18:34 EST

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix up build issues with vpanic"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH v2] pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount"
In reply to: Roman Gushchin: "Re: [PATCH] mm: skip lru_note_cost() when scanning only file or anon"
Next in thread: Hugh Dickins: "Re: [PATCH] mm: skip lru_note_cost() when scanning only file or anon"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sorry, sent a wrong version with a trivial bug. Below is the correct
one. The only difference is s/&sc/sc when calling scan_balance_biased().

--

Next message: Peter Zijlstra: "Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix up build issues with vpanic"
Previous message: Linus Walleij: "Re: [PATCH v2] pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount"
In reply to: Roman Gushchin: "Re: [PATCH] mm: skip lru_note_cost() when scanning only file or anon"
Next in thread: Hugh Dickins: "Re: [PATCH] mm: skip lru_note_cost() when scanning only file or anon"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]