Re: [tip: timers/clocksource] clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Don't register as a sched_clock on arm64

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 09:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> just a gentle ping for the question below about dropping the two patches.
>
> On 25/07/2025 15:15, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
>>> So I got no answer for this question, but I suppose my assumption is
>>> correct - so I've rebased the tip:timers/clocksource commits to fix the
>>> misattribution and a number of other problems, and also fixed various
>>> typos, spelling mistakes and inconsistencies in the changelogs while at
>>> it. Let me know if I got something wrong.
>> 
>> If the rebase is possible, I suggest to take the opportunity to remove 
>> the following patches:
>> 
>> commit 5d86e479193b - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Add module support
>> commit 7e477e9c4eb4 - clocksource/drivers/exynos_mct: Fix section 
>> mismatch from the module conversion
>> 
>> Because of:
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250725090349.87730-2- 
>> krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> 
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/bccb77b9-7cdc-4965- 
>> aa05-05836466f81f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Grrr.

I've already sent the pull request for the pile. Let me ask Linus not to
pull and I revert them on top.

Also please reset your clockevents branch so next does not have the
conflicting SHAs

Thanks,

        tglx