Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] Support exposing raw cycle counters in PTP and mlx5

[Carolina Jubran]

On 30/07/2025 1:40, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 09:57:13 +0300 Carolina Jubran wrote:
> > One concrete use case is monitoring the frequency stability of the
> > device clock in FreeRunning mode. User space can periodically sample the
> > (cycle, time) pairs returned by the new ioctl to estimate the clock’s
> > frequency and detect anomalies, for example, drift caused by temperature
> > changes. This is especially useful in holdover scenarios.
>
> Because the servo running on the host doesn't know the stability?
> Seems like your real use case is the one below.
>
> > Another practical case is with DPDK. When the hardware is in FreeRunning
> > mode, the CQE contains raw cycle counter values. DPDK returns these
> > values directly to user space without converting them. The new ioctl
> > provides a generic and consistent way to translate those raw values to
> > host time.
> >
> > As for XDP, you’re right that it doesn’t expose raw cycles today. The
> > point here is more future-looking: if drivers ever choose to emit raw
> > cycles into metadata for performance, this API gives user space a clean
> > way to interpret those timestamps.
>
> Got it, I can see how DPDK / kernel bypass may need this.
>
> Please include this justification in the commit message for v2
> and let's see if anyone merges it.

Thanks, I’ll include the DPDK/kernel bypass justification clearly in the 
v2 commit message and cover letter.

Additionally, I wanted to mention another relevant use case that wasn’t 
brought up earlier: fwctl can expose event records tagged with raw cycle 
counter timestamps. When the device is in free-running mode, correlating 
those with host time becomes difficult unless user space has access to 
both cycle and system time snapshots.