Re: [PATCHv2 01/12] x86/tdx: Consolidate TDX error handling

[Sean Christopherson]

On Wed, Jul 30, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
> So STATUS_OPERAND_BUSY() seems like an ok thing to try next for v3 of this
> series at least. Unless anyone has any strong objections ahead of time.

Can you make it IS_TDX_STATUS_OPERAND_BUSY() so that it's obviously a check and
not a statement/value, and to scope it to TDX?