Re: [PATCH 10/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Add compatible for S32G

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 03:31:08PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
> On 14/08/2025 7:25 pm, Frank Li wrote:

> > binding doc should first patch. Create new patch serial for add S32G
> > support only.

> I'm not sure putting the binding doc commit first would be right? That would
> imply it was a valid binding before it really was because the code change
> hasn't been made yet. Practically both are required so it doesn't really
> matter which way around they are.

It's the general practice everyone has adopted (though in this case the
bugfix bits might want to go before the bindings, possibly it's also a
bit unusual to do that).  An unused binding is more acceptable than an
undocumented one.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature